An Bord Altranais, the Catholic Church and Nurse Training, 1950-60

For today’s post, I will analyse developments in nurse training in Ireland between 1950-1960. I will examine the influence of the Catholic Church over nurse training.

From the 1890s, nursing training was confined to voluntary hospitals established by female religious institutions. Robins (Nursing and Midwifery in Ireland in the twentieth century: fifty years of an Bord Altranais (the Nursing Board) 1950-2000, p.20) states that nurses were required to pay a fee in order to train at one of these hospitals which led to the development of nursing as a middle class profession. However, the moral character of nurses was emphasised due to the influence of Florence Nightingale and the Sister of Mercy during the Crimean War. By 1900, nurses were ‘obedient, hardworking, gentle and vigilant’ and most importantly they were ‘moral’ figures (Preston, Charitable Words: Women, Philanthropy and the Language of Charity in Nineteenth Century Dublin, p.139). However, free medical services were distributed in poor parts of Western Ireland by Lady Dudley’s Nursing Scheme, founded in 1903, and nurses trained by Queen Victoria’s Institute of Jubilee Institute. These organisations were outwardly non-denominational as they trained both catholic and protestant nurses. However, they were trained in separate centres confined to Dublin (Pendergast, ‘Jubilee Nurses’ p.63).

In 1919, the General Nursing Council was established to supervise nurse training, examinations and to conduct inspections of training hospitals and centres. The Nurses Registration (Ireland) Act created a register for nurses and set up separate divisions of nursing such as psychiatric nursing and district nursing. Nurses had to be enrolled in a training hospital in order to join the register (Nurses Registration (Ireland), section 3.2 b). District nurses were also provided with refresher courses organised by the Irish Nurses Organisation. They usually ran for a week and were held in Dublin. Postgraduate included topics such as midwifery and child welfare (Moore, ‘Ireland and the Queen’s Institute’, p.508). As early as 1928, the Department of Local  Government advocated for the establishment of a training scheme for public health nurses (See Report of the DLGPH 1925-28, p.66).

In 1950, An Bord Altranais was formed when the General Nursing Council and the Central Midwives Board were amalgamated and the Midwives Committee was set up. The redefinition of district nursing, public health nursing and domiciliary midwives duties coincided with an interest in the creation of a district nursing course. District nurses carried out a range of duties to communities including preventative health services and child welfare services and therefore, they needed a training course. Under the 1953, Health Act, An Bord Altranais had the authority to approve nurse training hospitals and to appoint lecturers. However, the Catholic Church were against State interference in areas traditionally operated by Catholic religious orders such as hospitals. Robins (Nursing and Midwifery, p.33) argues that ‘nurses were seen as being on the front line of the defence of traditional family values and sexual relationships’. The Catholic Church sought to control subjects studied by student nurses in order to ensure that Catholic values were present in the nursing profession. They had objected to the free choice of doctor in Noel Browne’s Mother and Child Scheme due to fears that Protestant doctors would attend Catholic mothers and educate them on matters related to sexuality such as contraception. Under the 1953 Health Act poor women given a free choice of doctor and although the Maternity hospitals were divided in different zones in Dublin, however, patients could also apply to another hospital outside of her zone (Earner-Byrne, Mother and Child: Maternity and Child Welfare in Dublin, 1922-60 p.159). The same arguments were also emphasised when first Minister for Health, James Ryan proposed that sex education would be provided through the school medical service in the 1945 Health Bill.

From 1954, Archbishop McQuaid met with members of An Bord Altranais to address how ethics and psychology were taught in University College Dublin (Robins, Nursing and Midwifery, p.33). It was decided the syllabi would be reviewed by McQuaid (Ibid). The Catholic Church gained further control in nursing as they also ensured ‘that the lecturers chosen were to be appointed by each training hospital but only after the approval of the local bishop’ (Ibid, p.34). The Catholic Church also influenced the nursing syllabus. They proposed that there would be no official examinations for ethics and psychology for nursing students and these reforms also applied to Protestant students (Ibid).

In1956, the division pf public health nursing was founded and designated community health services such as undertaking vaccination schemes, operating maternity and child welfare centres and the school medical service. By 1959, the first short public health nursing course was established in UCD (Ibid, p.37). The nursing board were in charge of the refresher courses and existing public health nurses could qualify to practise and enter the register (Irish Nurses’ Magazine, Vol. 27, No. 8 (August 1960), p.9).

However, local authorities were reluctant to employ nurses who attended the new course. The Irish Nurses’ Magazine (Vol. 28, No. 9, p.10) argued that .Public health nurses who had undertaken the new public health nursing course found it difficult to acquire permanent jobs because ‘their additional training and experience [was] rated so low’. Subsequently, the creation of the public health nursing division contributed to the gradual decline of the voluntary nursing organisation (Robins, Nursing and Midwifery, p.39). Moreover, community nurses services were disorganised and inadequate in some areas outside of main cities and public health nurses duties required to work during off duty hours.

Bibliography

Primary Sources

Health Act, 1953.

Nurses Registration (Ireland). A bill to provide for the registration of nurses in Ireland.

Irish Nurses’ Magazine (August 1960-September 1962).

Irish Nurses’ Magazine, Vol. 28, No. 9, p.10.

Secondary Sources

Earner-Byrne, Lindsey, Mother and Child: Maternity and Child Welfare in Dublin, 1922-60, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 2007.

Moore, John W., ‘Ireland and the Queen’s Institute of District Nursing’, British Medical Journal, Vol. 2 No. 3532 (September 1928), pp.508-509.

Elizabeth Pendergast, ‘Jubilee Nurses’, Old Dublin Society, Vol. 66, No.1/2 (Spring/Autumn 2013), p.63.

Preston, Margaret H., Charitable Words: Women, Philanthropy and the Language of Charity in Nineteenth Century Dublin, Prager, Westport, 2004.

Robins, Joe (ed.) Nursing and Midwifery in Ireland in the twentieth century: fifty years of an Bord Altranais (the Nursing Board) 1950-2000, An Bord Altranais, Dublin, 2000. fffff

My First Experience of Presenting at a Conference: The Irish History Student’s Association 69th Annual Conference

For today’s post, I will discuss my experience of presenting a paper at a conference for the first time at the Irish History Student’s Association Annual Conference at Mary Immaculate College, Limerick.

During the 1950s, the IHSA conference was established in the 1950s by representatives from Irish universities. I was delighted when my abstract on ‘Public health nurses and the expansion of maternal and infant provision, 1922-1960’ was accepted by the organisers of the IHSA. They consistently sent out emails regarding the programme, direction to the campus and other important information leading up to the conference. The conference was held on the 1st – 3rd March 2019 at Mary Immaculate College, Limerick. I was chosen to present on the 14th panel on ‘20th Century health and body histories’ at 3:30pm on 2nd March alongside two other speakers.

I felt enthusiastic and a tad nervous to present a paper for the first time at a history conference. My only experience with public speaking had included classroom presentations in front of fellow students and friends as well as a year’s experience of debating during my time at secondary school. However, I constantly reminded myself that I was overly familiar with my research and that I had rehearsed my presentation at least five times at home. I was also looking forward to meeting other researchers with similar interests in maternal and child welfare in Ireland. I was especially excited to meet the chair of my panel, Dr Sarah-Anne Buckley, whom had undertaken research on the NSPCC and child welfare in the Irish Free State during the twentieth century.

However, due to the fact that I was travelling from Cork to Limerick I was unable to attend the Keynote address by Professor Jane Ohlmeyer (UCD) on Friday, 1st March. The organisers of the conference were very welcoming and kind as were all the other speakers I met on the day. They offered me advice on public speaking and gave me directions to the room I was presenting in. I felt relaxed and at ease while I presented my paper and was asked numerous questions at the end of my panel. I also had the opportunity to meet Dr Sarah-Anne Buckley whom was very friendly and interested in all the speakers’ papers.

Overall, it was an incredibly positive experience as I made new friends and researchers with similar interests to myself. The IHSA’s conference offers a great opportunity in a supportive and friendly environment for anyone interested in presenting for the first time. ffffff